PROPOSED
ZONING MIX
(MIXED USE) ; RETAIL - 137.10 SQUARE
FEET PER ACRE, OFFICE - 247.62 SQUARE FEET PER ACRE, MULTI-FAMILY - 1.095 UNITS
PER ACRE*, SINGLE FAMILY - 2.736 UNITS PER
PROPOSED USE RETAIL - 62,644 SQUARE FEET
OFFICE - 113,144 SQUARE FEET
APARTMENTS
- 350 UNITS*
ACTIVE
ADULT - 150 UNITS
TOWNHOUSES
- 450 UNITS
SINGLE
FAMILY - 800 LOTS
EXISTING ZONING M-1A (INDUSTRIAL PARK) - Z70-047 SFC &
98Z-002 SFC
SUB A (RESIDENTIAL)
EXISTING USE UNDEVELOPED
LAND USE MAP
RESIDENTIAL
- 3 TO 5 UNITS PER
RESIDENTIAL - 2 TO 3 UNITS PER
COMMUNITY LIVE WORK
LOCATION
691.90 FEET OF FRONTAGE
1,426.95 FEET OF FRONTAGE
PLUMMER ROAD (EAST SIDE):
2,533.86 FEET OF FRONTAGE
PLUMMER ROAD (WEST SIDE):
2,957.21 FEET OF FRONTAGE
RIVERSIDE DRIVE (NORTH SIDE):
2,422.31 FEET OF FRONTAGE
4,398.30 FEET OF FRONTAGE
6,910.8 FEET OF FRONTAGE
PARCEL SIZE 456.926 ACRES
SMALL AREA 516 & 517
LL 118, 130, 131, 132, 137, & 149
DISTRICT 14F
COMMISSION DISTRICT 7
OWNER CHARLES SUBER ET AL
PETITIONER VESLAND CAPITAL, LLC
REPRESENTATIVE LARRY DINGLE
APPLICANT'S INTENT To develop a mixed use development with 62,644 square feet of retail, 113,144 square feet of office, 350* apartments, 150 active adult housing units, 450 townhouses, and an 800-lot single family subdivision on 456.926 acres*. In addition, the applicant is seeking a concurrent variance to allow residential development within one mile of an existing enclosed transfer station. (Article 4.16.2.)
Department of Environment
and Community Development
Recommendation
Tax Parcel 14F-0149-LL-010-7:
2005 taxes in the amount of $16,350.56 are past due.
Community Zoning Board Recommendation
September 19, 2006
DENIAL: 2006Z -0065 SFC
DENIAL: 2006VC-0092 SFC
Board of Commissioners Meeting
October 4, 2006
DEFERRED FOR 30 DAYS
The case was deferred so the community could meet with the applicant and Staff. On October 11, 2006, a community meeting was held with Staff, the community, the applicant, and Georgia Department of Transportation representatives. Subsequently, Staff has received a signed agreement between the Sandtown Community Association and the applicant.
SUBJECT SITE AND SURROUNDING AREA:
SUBJECT SITE: The
subject 456.926 acre site is
zoned M-1A (Industrial Park) along
NEARBY AND ADJACENT PROPERTIES/ZONINGS: NON-RESIDENTIAL & MIXED USE
** North - Use: Industrial Park (Existing)
Petition: 87Z-033 SFC
Zone:M-1A (Industrial Park)
Density: 15,490 square feet per acre, 5,737,496 total square feet (no individual site can exceed a density of 18,000 square feet per acre)
** East - Use: Undeveloped (Approved for a retail/office shopping center)
Petition: 2002Z -0008 SFC
Zone: C-1 (Community Business)
Density: Retail - 6,704.83 square feet per acre, total 231,987 square feet
Office - 2,254.33 square feet per acre, total 78,000 square feet
Height: 2-stories
** Further Southeast - Use:
Zone: AG-1 (Agricultural)
** Further South -
Use: Rock Head United
Zone: AG-1 (Agricultural)
** South - Use: Undeveloped (Approved for a church with day care and a recreational field)
Petition: 2006U -0004 SFC (Church), 2006U -0007 SFC (Day Care), 2002U -0048 SFC (Recreational Field)
Density: 4,883.77 square feet per acre, 150,000 total square feet with max. 2,200 fixed seats, Students - 225 max. for day care use with additional 200 max for after school program
** Further South - Use: Undeveloped (Approved for a church)
Petition: 2003U -0022 SFC (Church)
Zone: SUB A (Residential)
Density: 1,238.40 square feet per acre, 12,000 total square feet, 500 seats
** Subject
Site and Southwest - Use:
Petition: 98Z -002 SFC
Zone: M-1A (Industrial Park)
Density: 20,890 square feet per acre, 2,139.789 total square feet
** Southwest - Use:
Petition: 99Z -055 SFC
Zone: M-1A (Industrial Park)
Density: 16,038 square feet per acre, 650,000 total square feet
** Further Southwest - Use: Undeveloped (Approved for mixed use)
Petition: 2006Z -0063 SFC
Zone: MIX (Mixed Use)
Density: Retail - 1,120.4 square feet per acre, 29,500 total square feet
Office - 379.8 square feet per acre, 10,000 total square feet
Townhouses - 5.47 units per acre, 144 total units
Minimum Heated Floor Area: 1,100 square feet
** Further Southwest (West side of
Petition: 2004Z -0084 SFC
Zone: M-1 (Light Industrial)
Density: 275.41 square feet per acre; 10,000 total square feet
** West (west side of
Petition: Z61-008 SFC
Zone: M-2 (Heavy Industrial)
Density: None Stated
** East & South - Use: Undeveloped
Zone: SUB A (Residential)
** Southeast - Use: Undeveloped (Approved for townhouse development)
Petition: 2006Z -0060 SFC
Zone: TR (Townhouse Residential)
Density: 4.76 units per acre, 81 total units
Minimum Heated Floor Area: 1,200 square feet
Height: 2 stories, not to exceed 40 feet
** South - Use: Undeveloped (Approved for single family subdivision)
Petition: 2006Z -0005 SFC
Zone: CUP (Community Unit Plan)
Density: 2.37 unit per acre, 34 lots
Minimum
Minimum Heated Floor Area: 1,800 square feet
** Further South - Use: Undeveloped
Petition: 2006Z -0036 SFC
Zone: CUP (Community Unit Plan)
Density: 2.91 units per acre, 37 lots
Minimum
Minimum Heated Floor Area: 1,800 square feet
** Further South - Use: (Vacant, Undeveloped, Existing, Approved, Under Development)
Petition: 2005Z -0037 SFC
Zone: CUP (Community Unit Plan)
Density: 3.01 units per acre, 78 lots
Minimum
Minimum Heated Floor Area: 1,800 square feet
** South - Use: Townhouse development (Under Construction)
Petition: 2003Z -0027 SFC
Zone: TR (Townhouse Residential)
Density: 6.80 units per acre, 215 units
Minimum
Minimum Heated Floor Area: 1,200 square feet
** There have been no RECENT DENIALS and there are no MISCELLANEOUS USES/ZONINGS in the immediate area.
SITE PLAN ANALYSIS:
Based on the applicant's revised site plan submitted to the Department of Environment and Community Development on October 20, 2006*, Staff offers the following considerations:
The petitioner is requesting to
rezone the subject site from M-1A (Industrial Park) and SUB A (Residential) to
MIX (Mixed Use) to develop 62,644 square feet of retail, 113,144 square feet of
office, 350* apartments, 150 active adult housing units, 450 townhouses, and 800
single family lots. The Comprehensive
Land Use Plan Map suggests
The site is currently zoned M-1A
(Industrial Park) along
Recent Board action in the area
includes retail/office use approved at the intersection of
Given the proposed mixed use development is consistent with the policy and intent of the Land Use Plan Map and is consistent with recent Board action in the area, Staff recommends APPROVAL CONDITIONAL of the applicant's request subject to the attached Recommended Conditions.
The applicant has requested a single family subdivision with 5 pods, named SF1 to SF-5 on the site plan. The applicant is requesting the following minimum lot size for these pods.
|
Pod Name |
Number of lots in the
pod |
Minimum |
|
SF1 |
138 |
6,875 square feet |
|
SF2 |
148 |
10,000 square feet |
|
SF3 |
183 |
8,750 square feet |
|
SF4 |
166 |
7,500 square feet |
|
SF5 |
165 |
6,250 square feet |
South of the subject site 10,000
square foot lots have been approved along Campbellton Road, pursuant to 2006Z
-0005 SFC, 2006Z -0036 SFC and 2005Z -0037 SFC.
Staff notes that the proposed single family lots are internal to the
development except along
On October 20, 2006 the applicant revised his site plan to show 10,000 square foot lots along the south property line of pods SF4 & SF5.
The applicant is requesting the following minimum heated floor areas.
|
Housing Type |
Minimum Heated
Floor Area |
|
Apartments |
700 square feet |
|
Active Adult |
700 square feet |
|
Townhouses |
1,300 square feet |
|
Single family detached, Pods SF1 & SF5 |
1,600 square feet |
|
Single family detached, Pods SR2, SF3, & SF4 |
1,800 square feet |
The applicant's request for 700
square feet for apartments and active adult units are consistent with the
minimum heated floor areas required by multi-family districts in the Zoning
Resolution. The request for 1,300 square
feet for the townhouse units is consistent with Board action in the area. Petitions 2006Z -0060 SFC and 2003Z -0027 SFC
required 1,200 minimum heated floor areas.
Staff notes that single family detached dwellings along
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
The applicant is requesting the following development standards for all single family lots.
Minimum Lot Width at Building Line 50 feet
Minimum Front Yard Setback 15 feet
Minimum Side Corner Setback 10 feet
Minimum Side Yard 0 feet
Minimum Rear Yard Setback 20 feet
Minimum Building Separation 10 feet
Staff supports the applicant's proposed standards except for the front yard setback. In order to provide adequate off-street parking space Staff recommends a 15-foot building setback with a 20-foot setback from the right-of-way to the garage door of any garage unit and for dwellings without garages a 15-foot front setback with a 20-foot front setback as measured from the right-of-way to the dwelling for the width of the driveway.
Staff recommends that all single family detached dwelling facades be staggered. Staggered setbacks shall be determined by the placement of the dwellings on either side of the dwelling in question. Said setback shall provide a minimum 5-foot variation for single family detached dwellings as measured from the back of curb. Staff has included the recommendation in the Recommended Conditions.
The following landscape strips and undisturbed buffers are required for the subject site.
West of
20-foot landscape strips along
15-foot landscape strip along
25-foot undisturbed buffer and 10-foot improvement setback along the south property line where townhouses are adjacent to SUB A (Residential) zoned property (side yards) (Article 4.23.1)
10-foot landscape strip along the south and east property lines where multi-family uses are adjacent to M-1A (Industrial Park) zoned property (side yards) (Article 12F.4. Section A.3)
East of
20-foot landscape strip along
East of
20-foot landscape strip along
25-foot undisturbed buffer and 10-foot improvement setback along the north property line adjacent to SUB A (Residential) (Article 4.23.1)
10-foot landscape strip along the north property line adjacent to M1-A (Industrial Park)
10-foot landscape strip along the south property line adjacent to C-1 (Community Business)
All detention facilities require a 20-foot landscape strip planted to buffer standards outside the required 10-foot access easement per Article 34.5.4.
Staff is of the opinion that the applicant can comply with the landscape and buffer requirements. Staff notes that the landscape strips are not a part of any single family lot.
The following chart
illustrates the parking required by Article 18 of the Fulton County Zoning
Resolution for the proposed uses:
|
Proposed Use |
Minimum Requirement |
|
Retail Service Commercial |
5 spaces per 1,000 square
feet of building area |
|
Restaurant
|
10
spaces per 1,000 square feet of building area |
|
Office |
3
spaces per 1,000 square feet of building area |
|
Multi-Family
Residential |
1
bedroom - 1.4 per unit 2
bedrooms - 2.0 per unit 3
bedrooms - 2.25 per unit |
|
Single Family Residential |
2 spaces per residence |
Article 4.16.2 requires that no portion of a new proposed residentially zoned or used property be located within a one mile radius of the property lines of an existing active transfer station.
The applicant is requesting the following concurrent
variance as follows:
To allow residential
development within one mile of an existing enclosed transfer station.
The subject site is located near
the Gateway Transfer Station which is located on the west side of
Staff notes that the facility is
located on the west side of
Given the transfer station is fully enclosed, utilizes state of the art technology, and has no previous violations, the request to allow residential development less than 1 mile from this enclosed transfer station is in harmony with the intent of the Zoning Resolution. Therefore, Staff recommends APPROVAL CONDITIONAL of the concurrent variance.
ENVIRONMENT
The Environmental Site Analysis
Report is sufficient and satisfies the requirement of the Fulton County Zoning
Resolution. A field survey of the site was conducted by
This site is located within a 1
mile radius of the Gateway Transfer Station. Retail and Office is proposed
adjacent to
The applicant is requesting a height of 1 and 2 stories for the retail/office buildings. Board action in the area has approved retail/office for a height of 2 stories and townhouses not to exceed 40 feet. Given Board action in the area, Staff recommends a maximum height of 2-stories for retail/office use and 40 feet for all residential structures.
Staff notes that there is a natural gas pipeline located on the
property. Article 34.5.10 of the Zoning
Resolution requires a minimum 40-foot setback from the easement for all
structures which will be occupied by humans.
The site plan shows compliance with the requirement.
Staff notes that the layout for the apartment and active adult communities are not shown on the site plan. The applicant will be required to submit a revised site plan through the zoning modification process and request approval from the Board of Commissioners prior to submitting an application for a land disturbance permit for the apartment and active adult residential developments. Staff has included the recommendation in the Recommended Conditions.
The applicant has proposed open space within the proposed
development. Staff notes that this
common area will not be part of any of the proposed lots within the
development. In addition, the
development includes a recreation area.
The applicant will be required to provide a mandatory homeowners
association to maintain the common area as well as the recreation area. Staff will reflect this in the Recommended
Conditions.
The majority of the site is in the Sandtown Overlay District. The applicant is required to comply with the standards of the Overlay District at the time of application for a land disturbance, building, or sign permit.
The applicant is contacting the
Fulton County Land Department regarding the road abandonment of a portion of
The proposed development
exceeded the threshold for development set by the Atlanta Regional Commission
(ARC). The applicant submitted a request
for a DRI (Development of Regional Impact) review (DRI #1132,
In addition, in a letter dated August 18, 2006,
the Atlanta Regional Commission found this project to be in the best interest
of the Region, and therefore, the State.
ARC provided additional comments as follows: The proposed development is
adjacent to the Sandtown Livable Centers Initiative (LCI) Study completed in
2002. Due to the location of the
proposed development, ARC recommends that the developer review the Sandtown LCI
Study and work with the community to meet the goals of the Study within the
development. In addition to the required
sidewalks, ARC recommends a trail system that would potentially connect with a
multi-purpose trail throughout the Sandtown Community. Per a request from ARC and GRTA, Staff has
included condition 6 in the Recommended Conditions that recommend compliance
with GRTA's “Notice of Decision”.
In order to assure a true
mixed use development, Staff is of the opinion that limits on the number of
residential units that can be built prior to the development of the
non-residential components of the development are necessary. Staff recommends a
limitation on the construction of the residential components to no more than
50% of the dwelling units within a specific use category (single family,
townhome, apartment etc.) until such time as the issuance of a building permit
for a minimum 50,000 square feet of non-residential use. Staff will reflect
this in the Recommended Conditions.
FINDINGS:
(Article 28.4.1) Planning Staff shall, with respect to each zoning application, investigate and make a recommendation with respect to factors A. through G., below, as well as any other factors it may find relevant.
A.
WHETHER THE ZONING PROPOSAL WILL
PERMIT A USE THAT IS SUITABLE IN VIEW OF THE USE AND DEVELOPMENT OF ADJACENT
AND NEARBY PROPERTY.
FINDING: The proposed mixed use development, if developed with Staff's Recommended Conditions, is suitable for the subject site given the existing and anticipated developments in the surrounding area.
B.
Whether the zoning proposal will adversely affect the existing use
or usability of adjacent or nearby property.
FINDING: In Staff's opinion, the proposed development will not have
an adverse effect on the use or usability of adjacent and nearby properties if
developed in accordance with the Recommended Conditions.
C. WHETHER THE PROPERTY TO BE AFFECTED
BY THE ZONING PROPOSAL HAS A REASONABLE ECONOMIC USE AS CURRENTLY ZONED.
FINDING: The subject site may have a reasonable use as currently zoned.
D. WHETHER THE ZONING PROPOSAL WILL RESULT IN A USE WHICH WILL OR COULD CAUSE AN EXCESSIVE BURDENSOME USE OF EXISTING STREETS, TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES, UTILITIES, OR SCHOOLS.
FINDING: Staff does not anticipate a significant impact on public services and facilities. However, some impact on the surrounding transportation system is expected but should be mitigated with compliance to the attached Recommended Conditions for project improvements. Some overcrowding of schools may occur.
E. WHETHER THE ZONING PROPOSAL IS IN
CONFORMITY WITH THE POLICIES AND INTENT OF THE LAND USE PLAN.
FINDING: The proposed mixed use development and use is consistent with the policies and intent of the Comprehensive Plan, provided the Recommended Conditions are incorporated into the development.
LAND USE PLAN
MAP:
Residential - 3 to 5 units per acre
Residential - 2 to 3 units per acre
Community Live Work
Proposed use/density: Retail - 137.10 square feet per acre
Office - 2.47.62 square feet per acre
Multi-family - 1.095* units per acre
Single family - 2.736 units per acre
The Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map suggests industrial use
along the west side of
PLAN POLICIES:
Provide for the transition of land uses from higher to lower densities and between different land uses.
Encourage development in areas where basic public facilities exist or are being improved, and discourage development in areas which would require inefficient or uneconomical extension of public facilities.
Promote interparcel and shared access between adjacent uses or within a development site.
Encourage appropriate building heights which are compatible with the surrounding area and are consistent with transitional and other land use policies.
Encourage planned residential development with homes and recreation areas oriented to internal streets, not facing or directly accessing external roads.
To encourage the development of a diverse mix of housing types, housing sizes, and prices/rents in response to the current and projected needs of County residents.
F. WHETHER
THERE ARE OTHER EXISTING OR CHANGING CONDITIONS AFFECTING THE USE AND
DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPERTY WHICH GIVE SUPPORTING GROUNDS FOR EITHER APPROVAL
OR DISAPPROVAL OF THE ZONING PROPOSAL.
FINDING Existing zonings, current mixed use development trends in
the area, and adopted land use policies support this request for a mixed use development.
G. WHETHER
THE ZONING PROPOSAL WILL PERMIT A USE WHICH CAN BE CONSIDERED ENVIRONMENTALLY
ADVERSE TO THE NATURAL RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENT AND CITIZENS OF
FINDING: The proposed development is not
considered environmentally adverse affecting natural resources, the environment,
or the citizens of
CONCLUSION:
Provided Staff's Recommended Conditions are incorporated into the development of the site, the proposed mixed use development is consistent with the policies and intent of the Comprehensive Plan and with approved zoni